CARSP | 2022 Abstracts – Research & Evaluation Stream | Canadian Association of Road Safety Professionals

Reviewer's Name

Abstract Title

Do you agree that the author selected the best stream for the abstract?
*

Yes

No

Do you recommend that the author switch streams?
*

Yes

No

Explain your rationale for recommending the switch.
*

Because you are recommending that the author switch streams, if the majority of reviewers agree, we will be asking the author to re-submit the abstract in the recommended stream. We will then ask you to review the revised abstract. If, however, the majority of the reviewers do not recommend this, we will at that time ask you to review the current abstract. Thank-you.

Review Questions

1. Are all required sections completed appropriately?

Yes

No

2. If a section is lacking in information, is an explanation provided?
*

Yes

No

N/A

3. Rate the quality of the writing in the abstract.
*

Where 1 is Not Acceptable, 3 is Acceptable and 5 is Excellent

4. Rate the relevance of the abstract's topic to Road Safety
*

Where 1 is Not at all relevant and 5 is Highly relevant

5. Choose whether the Methodology or Approach for this abstract is appropriate or inappropriate to adequately answer the aim(s) or objective(s).
*

Appropriate

Inappropriate

6. Rate the anticipated impact or usefulness of the abstract content to conference delegates
*

Where 1 is Not at all useful, 3 is Somewhat useful, and 5 is Very Useful

State your Recommendation for Accepting this Abstract
*

Accept

Reject

Reviewer’s General Comments (optional)

2022 Abstracts – Research & Evaluation Stream

Title of Abstract

Background

Aims

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Abstract Review

Review Questions

CARSP/ACPSER